For Sale Mark Reilly Omega steel bike

gilmo789

Retro Guru
Very nice frame by Mark Reilly.
58cm seat tube (C-T) (56cm seat tube (C-C))
53.5cm top tube
OS top and down tube
carbon fork threadless 1"
mudguard mounts all round
Not sure of tubing but clearly high quality
130 rear
It's a bit to short in the top tube for me


Selling the frame and forks.
More pics to come
£160 +postage
1759842722311.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CTK
Photos
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9942.resized.webp
    IMG_9942.resized.webp
    20.8 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_9941.resized.webp
    IMG_9941.resized.webp
    17 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_9940.resized.webp
    IMG_9940.resized.webp
    33.1 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9939.resized.webp
    IMG_9939.resized.webp
    27.4 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9938.resized.webp
    IMG_9938.resized.webp
    15.9 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9937.resized.webp
    IMG_9937.resized.webp
    13.6 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9936.resized.webp
    IMG_9936.resized.webp
    11.7 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9935.resized.webp
    IMG_9935.resized.webp
    15.3 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9934.resized.webp
    IMG_9934.resized.webp
    15.3 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_9933.resized.webp
    IMG_9933.resized.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 14
more
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9947.resized.webp
    IMG_9947.resized.webp
    31.7 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_9946.resized.webp
    IMG_9946.resized.webp
    17.7 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_9945.resized.webp
    IMG_9945.resized.webp
    30.2 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_9944.resized.webp
    IMG_9944.resized.webp
    19.9 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_9948.resized.webp
    IMG_9948.resized.webp
    34.8 KB · Views: 11
A 52cm top tube combined with a 57 seat tube is a highly unusual design. I can see the measuring tape in both photos, but I'd be inclined to recheck. If there is a measuring discrepancy, it's probably with the top tube ..... Have you measured a 'short cut' somewhere? Also, if it's a sloping top tube, measuring that tube will give a misleading dimension - it needs to be a virtual TT measurement
 
with careful measurement, I could say it's 58 x 53.5. but it's still a very short TT. I believe it was a custom for an older gentleman
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9949.resized.webp
    IMG_9949.resized.webp
    35.4 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_9950.resized.webp
    IMG_9950.resized.webp
    38.2 KB · Views: 2
Back
Top