MAG 21 SL Ti

steveg211067":198i3bbx said:
Hi,
Glad to see a lot of honest people on this site.
I have re-advertised the forks on ebay as I was trusting the buyer to return them to me! As I have refunded his money in full.
But obviously this has caused a few issues of me being bad mouthed.
I do not have any knowledge of these forks as I have described them as they were described to me when I bought them, obviously I was wrong and I bow down to all your wealth of knowledge. Once I receive the forks back I will endeavour to investigate the true identity of them. As none of the pics / information is conclusive proof etc.
I hope this clears up the situation!!!!!!!!!!!!! :evil:

I told you here what and why..
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... ht=#927074

They are a 1994 MAG21 SL/Ti fork, but they technically loose the SL part when the steerer/crown gets changed, since that is the main part of the 'SL' and it's selling point (and where the majority of the extra ££ is)
There is no functional/physical difference now to a standard 1994 MAG21 other than some Ti bolts and a magnesium brace and a different paint job.

So they'll look like a 1994 MAG21 SL/Ti (albeit with decals in the wrong place and the MAG 21 stickers missing. But with increased flex and weight of not having the original crown/steerer.
That is the true identity of them, do I need to back this up. If you do then just search this forum.
But what proof do you want ?

Still a nice fork and they still don't seem to have air in them ?
EDIT sorry, same picture. Do they hold air ?
 
Back
Top