Sarcasm noted ;-)GT-Steve":28rbjsly said:Crikey, so if I was to buy a high performance car, for example Aston Martin, Lamborghini, Ferrari, Bentley, R8, GTR, etc. etc. I could spec it with 15" steel wheels (provided they cover the brakesNeil":28rbjsly said:Contrary to popular belief, grip isn't directly related to width of tyres.) fitted with 195/50's instead of 275's+ and a 18/19 or even 20" rim, and with the correct weight distribution and tyre pressure expect exactly the same contact patch and thus - grip??? :?: :?:
In all seriousness, I've actually learned something today, thankyou.![]()
You're very welcome...
All I'm saying is that most people normally spout and equate tyre width equals grip - and all I'm saying is it's a fallacy.
Other factors may - or most likely are more relevant - looks, tyre compound, sidewall stiffness.
As to your snarky comments about the supercars, well their power output wouldn't be suited to tyres with deep sidewalls. All other things being equal, though, and grip from the tyres isn't something that's directly affected by the width of the tyre.
How many cars on the road look like they're that selective when choosing alloys - it's practically all about looks.GT-Steve":28rbjsly said:Hence my earlier statement regarding magnesium alloy wheels (such as Dymag's)Neil":28rbjsly said:But some cheapo alloys are no better, weight wise, than steel wheels.![]()
which most definitely ARE lighter.
![]()
![]()
Your average chav sortin' his Saxo with some alloys, innit, from Halfords, probably have no clue whatsoever about the weight.
All I'm saying is that for the vast majority of cars, the choice of alloy wheels over steel wheels, is about how they look, rather than how they perform.