Late 90s Kilaeau

1997, size 16. They don't really illustrate what they mean by "moderate to heavy marks to frame and forks", and for "almost all original", read almost all not original and down-graded.

I wish mine was that colour though. Unless it's just the camera settings.
 
No no no...
You're both far too big for this. :wink: Why, it would only just fit my daughter and she's only 4'8".
Perfect timing, cos she's now outgrown her Hotrock, and I asked her yesterday what sort of bike she wanted next.
Her answer- "A blue one"! :P
 
Harry I want to throw in the fact I have short arms!. Into the equation.. :).

Sun...girls don't like blue so you shouldn't :) bid on it
 
I'm 5-7 and I find my size 16 very comfortable in this form, although I might not be so keen on the eBay set up with an Indy fork, no stem stackers, a long flat stem and a flat bar. That kind of retro position is too low for me and if a bike is low at the front, it can begin to feel too short IMPE.

The only thing I don't like about the basic frame design is the short (9cm) head tube, but 2cm of extra spacers don't really make any difference to the way a bike rides. In theory I am inside the height range for a size 18, and above the height range for a size 16, but personally I find the 16 much better. One thing is that a shorter wheelbase makes the steering livelier. But that's just me, others may well differ, and 5-9 may be too much, I don't know. 5-9 is right in the middle of the size 18 height range according to Kona.
 

Attachments

  • 1994 Kona Explosif size 16 at the Chattri Memorial.webp
    1994 Kona Explosif size 16 at the Chattri Memorial.webp
    59.8 KB · Views: 788
Back
Top