stevek":33x5bwcm said:How was it built in? Bonded? I can't imagine why they'd fit a shim and not make it removable.
Maybe it was dissimilar metal corrosion and stuck in? :?
stevek":2mt2n65e said:How was it built in? Bonded? I can't imagine why they'd fit a shim and not make it removable.
Maybe it was dissimilar metal corrosion and stuck in? :?
Tallpaul":1owppg9f said:stevek":1owppg9f said:How was it built in? Bonded? I can't imagine why they'd fit a shim and not make it removable.
Maybe it was dissimilar metal corrosion and stuck in? :?
I presume it was press-fit? :?
It was the same on my Hei Hei. You couldn't just slide it out like, say, a USE seat-post shim.
If your KK is a 2000, it has a 34.9 seat tube, whereas Steve and Paul both have a 31.8 on their bikes. I don’t know the gauge in either case, but maybe a 31.8 tube needed to be strengthened by bonding in the shim, whereas the 34.9 is fundamentally stronger and didn't need that? Or could there still be a bonded-in shim plus a replaceable one as well, as (34.9 - 2 x c1mm) down to 27.0 would require quite a thick shim?stevek":24p8s6yv said:As Anthony has said it'd be pretty hard (?) to find 0.2 shim and this guy appears to be saying that he's changed the shim out. "Seat tube shimmed from 27.0 down to 26.8mm to give a wider selection of seat posts" so he's saying it now takes a smaller size pin hence a larger shim in there.
Unless the "shim" is a strip of coke tin in there!![]()