I crimped the chainstay to suit a 200mm rear rotor.

[Harryburgundy]

I had to re-read this.....

I crimped the chainstay to suit a 200mm rear rotor.

Interesting.....what did you do?

Take mole-grips to a £2.5K frame so you could add a massive 200mm rotor to a XC frame :shock:

Good skills..... :shock: What a chump

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Litespeed-Titaniu ... 4aa36b38d9

 

[Dr S]

16 bids too. Shows he is not alone in his stupidity.

:roll:

 

[suburbanreuben]

I like thway he points his finger at it, just in case you can't spot it... :roll:

 

[GoldenEraMTB]

He is a master of hyperbole and html.

shame about the frame :x

 

[GoldenEraMTB]

I like thway he points his finger at it, just in case you can't spot it... :roll:

 

[toaster999]

OMG :shock:

He must have been gutted when he did that. Whose bid 300 quid for that!

 

[john]

Everytime I see something like this I despair for the human race a little.

Although given the other errors of deisng Litespeed have made (the clearance issue) I guess we're lucky to have innovators like this to point us in the right direction. With his mole grips. On a 2K frame.

 

[detomaso]

Incredible :shock:

 

[CTK]

I bet it was worth it for the 0.3% power increase having a 200mm rotor gives you. Note that Steve Peat uses 160mm rotors sometimes...

 

[Harryburgundy]

I bet it was worth it for the 0.3% power increase having a 200mm rotor gives you. Note that Steve Peat uses 160mm rotors sometimes...

Exactly...and 200 on the rear :shock: Just find it hard to understand the thought process behind this...ermmm...modification!

I'll be rollong on the floor laughing for a few hours yet