"Future" retro

BlackCat":2kt3zjp1 said:
Hmmn.... possibly.... but all our modern steads will one day be regarded as "retro" by some young buck - the question is therefore, which are going to be the classics 15 years down the track?

Is the Orange Five the new Clockwork.... will the 2007 Hei Hei be held in the same regard as the 1997 etc?


The resistance is strong :lol: I agree with your first post, cotic/dialled/on one/singular. US wise I know Salsa, though nothing to do with the original has a strong following. Maybe Yeti too?
 
The only thing that makes a bike 'retro' or desirable is the people buying them.
For example bikes like the Raleigh Chopper will always be a hot one because it was so unique, The Raleigh Burner is getting up there with the value, but for how long. Think about the age of the bike and the age of the people buying them. In 10 years time i don't think the burner will be worth as much as it is now but it's the reverse for the Chopper.

Mountain bikes were a new thing, you could argue about the year but lets face it, mass production and interest started very late 80's. So most bikes from that era will seem very atractive to anybody that was in their teens then.

If you rode past an average 13yr old today on...say.. a Dyna-tech, clockwork, yo or similar he wouldn't even look twice and if he did it would be to point and laugh at the poor person that can't afford a 'new' bike.

I have a Giant XTC2 with carbon rear end and carbon bling, to me it's a mass produced bike that i ride all the time and means only one thing..keeping fit and having fun, but in 20 years time some 30 something will see one on ebay and say 'oh my god i remember them i always dreamed of owning one' (perhaps not this bike but you get where i'm coming from!)or 'bugger me i had one of those, i'll bid up to £300 for that!!'.

New technology will always stand out and stand the test of time, be it crap or great. Look at girvin flexstem, at the time i would have rather shoved it up my a**e rather than have it attached to my bike. But now................................

:roll:


So in summary..... It's all about how old you are/where when you remember/see your first dream bike.
 
Component wise, Chris King, Thomson, Pauls, White Industries, Phil Wood...Hope probably.
 
I'd put in a bet for Santa Cruz: Heckler and Superlight. One of thosethings that appears to have stood the test of time.

I don't own one, have never ridden one, just a guess.

I also (like others) suspect some cruddy thing which epitomises the time - not necessarily good, just unique. Maybe a fixie...?
 
Any bike or component a lot of folk like now will be a retro classic in the future. To say bikes of today will never be classics is just pure snobbery by the retro riders of today, your just sounding like your dads.......' in my day bikes were proper bikes, not the namby pamby rubbish you younguns ride etc etc etc' :lol:

Old Specialized bikes in the future that are presently new will still be desired by someone, very possibly by me, if I'm still riding 8)

A 2009 Tricross might be just my thing when I'm 60 :roll: I'm very nearly 40 now in case you wonder :lol:
 
Surely not Treks, though?

Dunno why, but they just don't seem to inspire love now.

But I bet they will be seen through the warm glow of Armstrong's tour wins.
 
Bomber RAC will be worth some money I think.

BMW (BrooklynMachineWorks) frames and parts before sellout.

Most high-end suspension frames seems not to become sought after classics. I thought the Intense M1 would be a future collectors item, however it sells quite cheap at the moment. Maybe 10 more years?
 
I think the new retro will be from the likes of spank,so look for the small scale production workshop,that is where you shall find it.
 
i like to think my scott genius would be considered retro, they're pretty rare on the trails now as it is and it's got a pretty interesting/unusual design, come 20 years time i think it will be kind of retro.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top