forget 29er's go 36er instead
- Thread starter mattbrown
- Start date
- Feedback
- View
What?!
Jesus, the guy is just having fun. Whats 7" between friends? (
)
But seriously, I think its a great concept. It took along time for 29" to become the next big thing, all because people werent willing to accept that it was better for rolling fastr over bigger obstacles.
This guy has clearly thought, ''well if 29" rolls and handles better than 26", then what would something even bigger handle like?''
He's not asking the whole world to change, just experimenting. I applaud the effort.
It clearly appears to have taken things too far, but with a more dialled in frame, I bet one of our 6'7" tall 37" leg retrobikers could have a ball.
Jesus, the guy is just having fun. Whats 7" between friends? (
)But seriously, I think its a great concept. It took along time for 29" to become the next big thing, all because people werent willing to accept that it was better for rolling fastr over bigger obstacles.
This guy has clearly thought, ''well if 29" rolls and handles better than 26", then what would something even bigger handle like?''
He's not asking the whole world to change, just experimenting. I applaud the effort.
It clearly appears to have taken things too far, but with a more dialled in frame, I bet one of our 6'7" tall 37" leg retrobikers could have a ball.
velomaniac
MacRetro Rider
I want one, but then I'm one of the huge retrobikers. Dont think there is any decent off road rubber in that size as yet or ever 
- Feedback
- View
will roll better but how hard will it be to get the bad boy started in the first place?
And they do look ugly but to be fair, so am I
And they do look ugly but to be fair, so am I
Similar threads
