ajm":92ecd0xo said:
Neil":92ecd0xo said:
All that said, back in those days, Unix was far from being a secure OS.
True (though I suppose then, as now, a lot depended on exactly how it was set up)... even quite a lot later on I worked at a University where we had labs full of Sun workstations all with public IP addresses and every service you can think of wide open to the Internet - crazy even then!
Even if being careful about setup - and most weren't back then with Unix - it still was far from the most secure thing out there.
True enough, there wasn't anything like the same threats, demand, or risk - but a lot of the time, you'll here people talking about Unix and it's origins as this truly great, white-sheet-of-paper design of OS, that was pretty strong out of the box.
Well I was on the ground in the industry back then - and it wasn't. Most people, then, were doing serious work in mainframe environments, that were regimented, reasonably secure, and very organised. Unix was quite a culture change from that, I can tell you.
Don't get me wrong - probably the most interesting and happiest times I've had in the industry, were as a systems programmer working on Unix OSs, but all the same, it took a lot of work, back then, to do anything decent with it, in the same way as people were using mainframes, back then. Now it's also true, the game was changing, as was the use of computers, but all the same, comparing mainframes to Unix back then, or actually evaluating how secure Unix tended to be, in reality, is quite different from how it's purported these days.