Drapoon":s6inos31 said:
cheers for the warning mike - 9 months?!
That's 9 'Scant' months, bear in mind. The guy has the bike surgically attached to him and even rides it round the house.
Much as in the old days when there was a lovely factor used by MBUK to work out weight to strength ratios (the Hairsine factor or something wasn't it) we should use the 'Scantregard' factor.
So if Mike breaks things in 9 months then apply the following multiplier:
-Times 1.5 if you ride aggressively
-Times 2 if you go out every night
-Times 3 if you are an average rider
-Times 4 if you go out once a week
-Times 5 if your bike is a garage queen
-Times 10 if you're Jez as no bike part has ever been in his stable long enough to wear out!