These sort of stories just wind me up... it's just filler crap. What is the point of it? It's quite obvious it was nowhere near the bridge from the video anyway, even in super slow mo it looks miles behind the bridge and with that camera angle it's also miles higher than the bridge. Reading the article the onboard systems recorded the closest distance to the bridge as 1,200feet! Hardley close!
Now i'm annoyed because I am talking about it and should have just ignored it.