1994 Kona Explosif

OK, but it still looks pretty good to me. Obviously I don't know how much time you want to put into the sale, but the frame would probably look a lot better if you gave it a nice clean and polish. And I recommend that before you hit the trails, you might consider slotting the front brake cable into the lever, otherwise you might be hitting those pesky trails harder than you bargained for. :cry:

For maximum value, you would strip the bike down and sell it part by part, especially if all the parts have been treated with tender female care all their soft lives. e.g., those thumbies could fetch $40 easy, the Bontrager/Titec ti bars are worth $50, the stem $25, the headset $30, etc The frame, in the UK anyway, maybe $200. But maybe that's a bit of a sad thing to do, and you're not sad. The complete bike maybe in the region of $450-500? Or better still, keep it and start riding it again, you might find you need it more than you need $500. No, it doesn't take up too much room, something else does.

Incidentally I assume the seatpost isn't stuck, and if so it's worth saying so. And it's worth saying that the size 17 frame is designed for riders from 5-3 to 5-9. And it's worth linking through to the catalogue pages, which are on here:

http://www.retrobike.co.uk/gallery2/mai ... ewsIndex=1
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/gallery2/mai ... ewsIndex=1

Best of luck, hope you see the light in time!
 
Nice bike, wish I could afford it...!

Anthony":2achbbne said:
And it's worth saying that the size 17 frame is designed for riders from 5-3 to 5-9.

There was no 17-inch size according to that catalogue page, it's an 18-inch. What height range?

Dr. Matt.
 
DoctorRad":19bdbp4w said:
Nice bike, wish I could afford it...!

Anthony":19bdbp4w said:
And it's worth saying that the size 17 frame is designed for riders from 5-3 to 5-9.

There was no 17-inch size according to that catalogue page, it's an 18-inch. What height range?

Dr. Matt.

Looks like a 17" to me. Kona are well known for discrepencies like this, at least here they are anyway. If you compare the pic in this thread to our Miss Drozen's Explosif you can see the difference. Most noticeable would be the more sloping top tube plus the length of stem.

How dare you doubt Anthonys' knowledge Dr Rad. Shame on you :wink:
 
DoctorRad":36uyrjjp said:
Nice bike, wish I could afford it...!
Anthony":36uyrjjp said:
And it's worth saying that the size 17 frame is designed for riders from 5-3 to 5-9.
There was no 17-inch size according to that catalogue page, it's an 18-inch. What height range?
Dr. Matt.
The frame is definitely a size 17, so we mustn't confuse the issue for drozen.

The understandable confusion arises from the fact that the only catalogues on the web are those collected by the British enthusiast Stewart Pratt and shown on his extremely valuable konaretro site. These were the images copied for this website and also mtb-kataloge.de. Size 17 frames weren't imported into the UK before 1995, so prior to that the UK catalogues didn't show them. I don't know when Kona first started making size 17, but it may well have been 1993 - this page from the 1993 US catalogue shows size 17s certainly available there then.
 

Attachments

  • page 14 - specifications.webp
    page 14 - specifications.webp
    133 KB · Views: 771
Back
Top