Skeelsie Gold Trader Feedback View Jul 24, 2010 #1 Contemplating doing the above with some Ritchey lightweight tubes in some 1.95" Panaracer speed blasters, will the only negative be they are likely to puncture pretty fast or will I just ruin the tubes? :?
Contemplating doing the above with some Ritchey lightweight tubes in some 1.95" Panaracer speed blasters, will the only negative be they are likely to puncture pretty fast or will I just ruin the tubes? :?
mikee Gold Trader MacRetro Rider GT Fan Feedback View Jul 24, 2010 #2 should be fine m8 I've ran 20" tubes in a 26" wheel before ,bit of a stretch but worked fine
Skeelsie Gold Trader Feedback View Jul 24, 2010 #3 Hmmm that's quite a stretch. Makes me thinks the tolerances in a tube are pretty wide to accommodate all sorts. Ta.
Hmmm that's quite a stretch. Makes me thinks the tolerances in a tube are pretty wide to accommodate all sorts. Ta.
FairfaxPat Senior Retro Guru Jul 24, 2010 #4 Before I went tubeless, I always used 1.5 tubes in my 2.1 MTB tires because they are lighter and work just as well as the larger tubes.
Before I went tubeless, I always used 1.5 tubes in my 2.1 MTB tires because they are lighter and work just as well as the larger tubes.
Grannygrinder Retrobike Rider Gold Trader Feedback View Jul 24, 2010 #6 . CRC were doing the 1.75 Ritchey tubes for £2 each a while back. I bought a load and have used them without problems with tyres upto and including 2.1
. CRC were doing the 1.75 Ritchey tubes for £2 each a while back. I bought a load and have used them without problems with tyres upto and including 2.1
D dan28 Senior Retro Guru Jul 25, 2010 #7 do you think i could get away with using a 2.00 tube in my 3.00 tyre then