Recent content by Dave2020

  1. D

    Muddy Fox Interactive!

    Re: Muddy Fox Intereactive! No call to be so mean-spirited, 'History Man'. Four posts in nearly three years is hardly hogging the limelight. Some would like to learn more about half a century of (mis-directed) suspension design, and the story has intimate connections with cars and motorcycles...
  2. D

    Muddy Fox Interactive!

    "However that means either very low slung car bodies as in F1, or very big wheels." No it doesn't. F1 cars roll and wheel size is immaterial. You are confusing conventional design with sensible design. Smart design makes a 'tall' SUV with long-travel suspension AND zero roll. Read what I wrote:-...
  3. D

    Muddy Fox Interactive!

    Re: Muddy Fox Intereactive! " . . to see if it worked on a bike.. worth a try." Er, no! - not worth a try, because it can't possibly "work" - just as it didn't work on the 2CV, which was infamous for its instability. I'm reminded of an in-depth technical article in 'Autosport' - a candid...
  4. D

    Muddy Fox Interactive!

    MF were going to run with the original design, but decided they wouldn't pay the invoices from Harris Performance Products, which kinda destroyed any working relationship, so they couldn't deliver what the brochure promised. That's a mind-boggling business strategy isn't it?!! Can't see...
  5. D

    Muddy Fox Interactive!

    INTEREACTIVE suspension samc Does anyone know how many were made? Well, I should know! - but Muddy Fox never told me, because they didn't want to pay any royalties. For the record, the license agreement covered two designs, but Pacific Cycles were so upset by MF they didn't put the...
Back
Top