dek1165":147csr4v said:There are some miserable sods about![]()
dek1165":147csr4v said:I hope I don't offend too many people but it will be nice to see some bikes more representative of what a lot of people actually ride. Should be STX though.
cheers
Jon
drystonepaul":2j9rs7iz said:For me mid-range has always meant a bike which sits at least three or four models from the top of a larger brands' range.
Groupset: Mainly LX, STX, XC-E or lower but possibly with a rear mech or perhaps shifters up-specced to make it more appealing to the potential buyer.
Components: Mainly built with manufacturer branded items like the stem, bars etc, as opposed to non OEM parts.
As for frame material I'd say 4130 steel, or 7000 series alloy, but not ti or 6061 etc.
And it had to be available as a complete bike for about £600 or less.
That's me for starters...
mynchiboy":1c2xaxkp said:drystonepaul":1c2xaxkp said:For me mid-range has always meant a bike which sits at least three or four models from the top of a larger brands' range.
Groupset: Mainly LX, STX, XC-E or lower but possibly with a rear mech or perhaps shifters up-specced to make it more appealing to the potential buyer.
Components: Mainly built with manufacturer branded items like the stem, bars etc, as opposed to non OEM parts.
As for frame material I'd say 4130 steel, or 7000 series alloy, but not ti or 6061 etc.
And it had to be available as a complete bike for about £600 or less.
That's me for starters...
I reckon that's pretty bang on in my opinion, especially the point about frame material. Most mid range bikes were offered to give the most balanced package of frame and components that wouldn't fall to bits if they were ridden seriously off road, or even raced a little.. Therefore boutique frames with cheaper bits don't really qualify![]()