New GM vehicle lets you put full size MTB inside...

Ive got one of those boxy vauxhall agila efforts. By putting one half of the back seats down, I can get me and one lad up front, other lad in the back seat and all three bikes vertical behind me. I need to take the front wheel out mine, theirs go straight in. The secret is in the height.
 
pigman":3ofhagaw said:
JeRkY":3ofhagaw said:
The A2 was an excellent car, I heard its demise was due to it costing more to make than Audi could sell a small hatch for.

I still quite fancy one.

This was the one where the bonnet could only be opened by audi technicians. fluid checks were done through portholes. Not something I could live with.

And apparently it was so light having the windscreen wipers on made it rock quite alarmingly, and also affected the steering a bit too....
 
I did the same thing to a mk2 escort years ago . You get some funny looks with the masses of space to your side but a mate sat in the back

I carried a tandem that way a few times years ago. There's something strangely apt about two of you sitting in the car in the same arrangement as you'll be riding the bike ;-)
 
pigman":l60rni3k said:
JeRkY":l60rni3k said:
The A2 was an excellent car, I heard its demise was due to it costing more to make than Audi could sell a small hatch for.

I still quite fancy one.

This was the one where the bonnet could only be opened by audi technicians. fluid checks were done through portholes. Not something I could live with.
The bonnet's easy to remove - Open the service flap/grille, then turn a couple of knobs and lift it off completely.
 
My SAAB 900 classic swallows a full bike with greatest ease. GM came, killed some core values and now kills the brand.

Now GM issues a car that can take a bike. Chapeau! They had one already ...and it was way more pretty.
 
Vectras easily swallow a bike without having to take any wheels out, just fold the rear seats flat.
 
Just buy a second hand black cab, easily swallow an upright bike, no loss of seating and very manouverable. GM are just inventing a problem that did not exist before like Dyson and his Roller Ball vacs :roll:
 
I understand a Vectra fastback swallows a full bike, as pretty much all fastback type cars will do. However the CombiCoupe was launched as a result of SAAB typical out of the box thinking in a time pretty much every car manufacturer carried a saloon and only a saloon in that class. The CC can't be considered the very 1st though as I would think that honour goes to the Renault 16.

From '02 on the fastback model completely disappeared from the SAAB line up, giving up an untill than unique selling point and proofing there was no room anymore for a sincere vision on function. A saloon is pretty useless or at least highly impractical when you want to transport bicycles regularly, so an estate would be the only alternative. I prefer fastbacks over estates though, because of the large entry, for estates they ask a premium and personally I tend to like the looks of the fastback more.

I would have absolutely no idea what I had to buy if I had to buy a new car. A Land Rover is like a Swiss army knife to me, but I am not so often off road. Another clever car is a Lotus. Of all other cars I simply do not see the joy of owning. They are mere disposibles for me. Uninteresting, non sincere and absolutely not worth preserving. That is not how a want to enjoy and use my cars. Better keeping my current and buy myself a Lotus as 2nd within a couple of years.
 
If youre impressed with the new GM thing, buy an old transit... Youll be amazed by what you can fit in there!!!
 
fingers":y423fh32 said:
If youre impressed with the new GM thing, buy an old transit... Youll be amazed by what you can fit in there!!!

I have one of those, but's badged a Galaxy!! lol.

7 people one minute, a few complete bikes and a few passengers the next . . . . . all squeezed in the inside. Van meets Car! Fan-bleeeding-tastic. :LOL:
Steve
 
Back
Top