mattbrown":3i8h5ye9 said:Just don't go there!!!!!
I fear we are too late.
mattbrown":3i8h5ye9 said:Just don't go there!!!!!
But surely John's main motivation was to break the forum up into manageable chunks. Although pre-89 makes sense from an historic point of view, I don't think there are enough pre-89 bikes on here for them to need their own forum.The Ken":ysvmhtp6 said:I would be up for a pre'89 split - makes a lot of sense - I think it should include Klunkers style bikes of all ages too though.
Charlieboy28":3ujjmn81 said:I would deffo deff be up for a modern bike section, i tend not to look in the 98+ section because of the truly modern bikes in there.
brocklanders023":1otqr05f said:Charlieboy28":1otqr05f said:I would deffo deff be up for a modern bike section, i tend not to look in the 98+ section because of the truly modern bikes in there.
Where would the cut off be though? My 2009 Orange 5 looks quite similar to my old 2006 which was not that much different to the 2004. What's classed as modern? You could quite easily end up with a very narrow 98 to ? section with even less traffic then the current 98+ section which is pretty quite anyway.
I think it's fine as it is tbh and don't see the need to give John and the mods more work.