The team shots after the race on Sunday, didn't really show any ambivalence to him.
Everything I've read about the driver / team dynamic tells me, if a driver is performing, the team seem to like them.
Rosberg impressed me greatly during and after the race. He had the honesty and transparency to recognise, after the race, that the fault didn't make any true difference - Hamilton was already leading and pulling away. And he made a balanced, lucid synopsis of both their seasons, and recognised his own shortcomings - all within a brief period after the race.
A lot of drivers would have lept at the chance to park it when the team called him in, but he didn't - and by that point, I doubt it was a last wild hair of hope - think he was 12th at the time.
I'm hardly a big fan of Hamilton - but not really a hater either. However you spin it, though, he more than deserved this WC. He out-raced Rosberg all season, and Rosberg never put a true overtake on him that stuck, or wasn't down to car problems.
That said, Rosberg also proved something - he was the man in qualifying - which is a bigger surprise over Hamilton. What I'm a little unsure on, was whether that was purely because he has managed to be truly quicker in qualie scenarios, or whether simply he's less prone to mistakes over very limited / short runs.
I choose to think Mercedes done good this year in letting them compete - largely. That said, I think it was a mistake to be anything other than impartial over the Spa incident - let them call it as they see it behind closed doors, but I think it was an error to air that in public. I think it (and previous instances that were the triggers for that) went, someway, to undermine Rosberg - although in fairness, I think Hamilton was just better racer than Rosberg this season.