P20":dsqxzz4j said:I seem to remember that it descended into (for this place anyway) a bun fight.
It didn't. Simply nobody really cared.
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... tm&start=0
P20":dsqxzz4j said:I seem to remember that it descended into (for this place anyway) a bun fight.
JeRkY":1rs9u04c said:Excellent, lets embrace and grow this needless segregation.
Certain "special" months have allowed for 98+ bikes, and they tend to attract the interesting builds/models.
Personally I am not interested in seeing a load of stock 2006 specialized humpjumpers or Trek Fuels etc. If I wanted to look at a page of people showing them off there are other websites, or I could just walk into Evans.
jamabikes":3d3pgzzp said:JeRkY":3d3pgzzp said:Excellent, lets embrace and grow this needless segregation.
Certain "special" months have allowed for 98+ bikes, and they tend to attract the interesting builds/models.
Personally I am not interested in seeing a load of stock 2006 specialized humpjumpers or Trek Fuels etc. If I wanted to look at a page of people showing them off there are other websites, or I could just walk into Evans.
well naff off and dont look then!
i personally dont have any interest in looking at fut chance and mountain gout bikes as they have no relevance to my riding past. the way i get round this is to not look at em.
and wasn't the point of the segregation because some people slammed people from entering modern bikes in the first place?
Tallpaul":6ctsphtu said:P20":6ctsphtu said:I seem to remember that it descended into (for this place anyway) a bun fight.
It didn't. Simply nobody really cared.
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... tm&start=0
jamabikes":imhw1kja said:i personally dont have any interest in looking at fut chance and mountain gout bikes as they have no relevance to my riding past. the way i get round this is to not look at em.
and wasn't the point of the segregation because some people slammed people from entering modern bikes in the first place?