Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:04 pm

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:28 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:42 pm
Posts: 712
Location: East Yorkshire
Had this frame set donated to my collection by Shortarts today, Cheers Steve!
It’s a frame that was dragged out of a loft during a house renovation project, then unceremoniously dumped in a builder’s skip. :cry:
Fortunately Steve, spied the end of the forks and hoyked it to safety… :D
I’d seen some photos and one particular detail stood out, that of the cable roller. Matching that with the date I originally thought it might be a Continental Classique.
Now I have the frame in my possession, I realise my initial thoughts are way out, I think its most likely to be a No6 “Closed Circuit” Mk2, this is by far the closest to its kit and details although there is one curved ball… The KROMO Chrome Molybdenum Steel tubing transfer.
The "Closed Circuit" bikes are advertised in the 1949 Catalogue and the last reference I can find to Accles & Pollock tubing was in the 1948 catalogue, whereas this frame is clearly stamped up as built in 1951.
So, I’m going to run some photos and details past the CB Marque specialist at the VCC. And get a second opinion.

But if any of you want to throw your two peneth in, be my guest!

Chris. 8)


Attachments:
MysteryClaud.jpg
MysteryClaud.jpg [ 500.93 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
No7 Closed Circuit.PNG
No7 Closed Circuit.PNG [ 499.14 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
Kromo.JPG
Kromo.JPG [ 501.79 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
Im19360422Cy-AP.jpg
Im19360422Cy-AP.jpg [ 136.28 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
51 5 522.JPG
51 5 522.JPG [ 495.47 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
Gnutti.JPG
Gnutti.JPG [ 498.25 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
Hurret.JPG
Hurret.JPG [ 490.35 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]
HurretLever.JPG
HurretLever.JPG [ 474.89 KiB | Viewed 744 times ]


Last edited by PeachyPM on Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:55 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:42 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:42 pm
Posts: 712
Location: East Yorkshire
And some lug details;


Attachments:
StraightBridge.JPG
StraightBridge.JPG [ 505.65 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (14).JPG
Mystery (14).JPG [ 453.24 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (16).JPG
Mystery (16).JPG [ 469.3 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (12).JPG
Mystery (12).JPG [ 477.15 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (10).JPG
Mystery (10).JPG [ 449.91 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (9).JPG
Mystery (9).JPG [ 436.12 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (8).JPG
Mystery (8).JPG [ 438.02 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Mystery (7).JPG
Mystery (7).JPG [ 417.52 KiB | Viewed 740 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 9:43 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:08 am
Posts: 7871
Location: Nth Somerset, UK
GAWD! You like a bit of a challenge, don't you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:48 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:42 pm
Posts: 712
Location: East Yorkshire
NeilM wrote:
GAWD! You like a bit of a challenge, don't you.


Out of the two free bikes I was given on that day Neil, I think we both know which one is going to be the easier! :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:18 am 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:36 am
Posts: 29
Nice find! Who doesn't appreciate a decent skip find?

Interested to see how it cleans up, the pitting looks pretty deep in a few places. I'm sure you'll do your usual cracking job of course!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:38 am 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:10 pm
Posts: 1031
I really like those Gnutti splined cranks... theoretically. No cotter pins, no dedicated crank removal tools necessary..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:41 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:42 pm
Posts: 712
Location: East Yorkshire
skylark wrote:
Nice find! Who doesn't appreciate a decent skip find?

Interested to see how it cleans up, the pitting looks pretty deep in a few places. I'm sure you'll do your usual cracking job of course!

Got THM to thank for this one, the “find” was on the introduce yourself thread….

torqueless wrote:
I really like those Gnutti splined cranks... theoretically. No cotter pins, no dedicated crank removal tools necessary..



Hmmm, nice theory, the retaining bolt moved no problem, and the splined axle looks clean enough, but this baby isn’t going anywhere without a fight….. its now soaked in WD40 whilst I earn brownie points in the garden…


Attachments:
file-37.jpeg
file-37.jpeg [ 469.3 KiB | Viewed 647 times ]
file1-16.jpeg
file1-16.jpeg [ 499.25 KiB | Viewed 647 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:47 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:47 am
Posts: 579
Location: The South Coast's Premier Dump
Looks like a great project but one thing is bugging me. Are the forks straight? I know the picture is close up (mystery 12) but to my eye the forks don't look parallel to the head tube.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 2:51 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:42 pm
Posts: 712
Location: East Yorkshire
Whilst mowing the lawn I had a little epiphany… working on the principle that the mechanical advantage of un-screwing a thread is quite strong, I hit upon the idea of ganging up a couple of cheep thin Halford spanners and then un-screwing the left cup against them…. Hey presto…easy peasy :D


Attachments:
Idea.jpeg
Idea.jpeg [ 386.94 KiB | Viewed 642 times ]
Magic.jpeg
Magic.jpeg [ 488.1 KiB | Viewed 642 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:50 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:42 pm
Posts: 712
Location: East Yorkshire
peetee wrote:
Looks like a great project but one thing is bugging me. Are the forks straight? I know the picture is close up (mystery 12) but to my eye the forks don't look parallel to the head tube.



I see what you mean, but rest assured they are fine. The photo has them back to front and without any balls in the head set.

I’m more concerned about the chain stay, I can’t work out if the kink is deliberate or not… whats swaying me towards a deliberate Kink is;
a. The drop-outs are parallel
b. The seat stays are straight
c. If the chain stay wasn’t kinked, it would be extraordinarily close to those Guntti twin chain rings


Attachments:
KinkyLeg.jpeg
KinkyLeg.jpeg [ 477.65 KiB | Viewed 628 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group