Anyway back on topic...
NeilM":334izn9r said:Exactly so.k-rod":334izn9r said:Think of it this way, an old British single or twin is a backward, inferior, under-powered rattle-can that needs endless fettling and attention to use. Unless someone is totally passionate about them - and thus, probably already own one ... why would anyone want to buy one in this day and age, when motorbikes are as powerful and reliable as they are?
Now, the collectors out there who have owned their Matchless or Norton or Triumph for decades, and love wrenching o the things and bumping and clattering about the country-side at slightly above legal speeds ... well they are the ones who will need the odd bit or part in order to keep their beloved, oil leaking British steel going ...
:idea:
Although the growing number of Indian Royal Enfield's on the road, throbbing with their massive 500cc 34 BHP engines, do make you question the first part of your post.
:facepalm:
roadking":17fz37aw said:k-rod":17fz37aw said:Think of it this way, an old British single or twin is a backward, inferior, under-powered rattle-can that needs endless fettling and attention to use. Unless someone is totally passionate about them - and thus, probably already own one ... why would anyone want to buy one in this day and age, when motorbikes are as powerful and reliable as they are?
Now, the collectors out there who have owned their Matchless or Norton or Triumph for decades, and love wrenching on the things and bumping and clattering about the country-side at slightly above legal speeds ... well they are the ones who will need the odd bit or part in order to keep their beloved, oil leaking British steel going ... hence, it is easier to sell the machines in busted up form (unless it happens to be a highly prized collector's model).
:idea:
Strange remark from someone purporting to be interested in old, outdated, anachronistic steel bicycles !
Rk.