Augustus Retrobike Rider Feedback View Sep 25, 2008 #2 Thought these were Sub Zeros at first, but am fairly sure they are Zero 0.4's. Or at least early Zero's. Model before the latest wraparound (dismal) effort under the name Zero.
Thought these were Sub Zeros at first, but am fairly sure they are Zero 0.4's. Or at least early Zero's. Model before the latest wraparound (dismal) effort under the name Zero.
slinky182 Retro Guru Feedback View Sep 25, 2008 #3 Oakley's They're sub zero's mate. I had a pair and lost them. Gutted!
Augustus Retrobike Rider Feedback View Sep 25, 2008 #4 Re: Oakley's slinky182":wcwhjb9h said: They're sub zero's mate. I had a pair and lost them. Gutted! Click to expand... I wouldn't be surprised if you were about to be able to buy another pair off Scant.
Re: Oakley's slinky182":wcwhjb9h said: They're sub zero's mate. I had a pair and lost them. Gutted! Click to expand... I wouldn't be surprised if you were about to be able to buy another pair off Scant.
S scant Retro Wizard Feedback View Sep 25, 2008 #5 I used to be fairly up to date on oakleys, then they started producing them at a rapid rate & I lost touch :roll:
I used to be fairly up to date on oakleys, then they started producing them at a rapid rate & I lost touch :roll:
C cornholio's RC200 Retrobike Rider Gold Trader Feedback View Sep 25, 2008 #6 Agree with wu-tangled Original Zero 0.4s Much better than the 'trendy' new ones.
REKIBorter Retrobike Rider Gold Trader 98+ BoTM Winner Feedback View Sep 26, 2008 #7 It should say inside the arm
