Chris King bearing cap SOLD ----

F.R.O.

Senior Retro Guru
Sales withdrawal not be 100% accurate the description
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    image.webp
    43.6 KB · Views: 708
  • image.webp
    image.webp
    37 KB · Views: 708
Re: SOLD pending Payment--------Chris King

Turns out that this is neither a grip lock, or a standard 1 1/8 headset top race cover. It's a top cover from a devolution headset as the cap is far too wide in diameter to fit a standard 1 1/8 bearing cup. Also, if it was a grip lock, it would have the split ring on the inside which it doesn't.

Not advised seller of the latter, as not fussed, but the important fact for me was that this part fitted a 1 1/8 chris king headset (that was the title and description after all), but it doesn't. After reporting this to the seller, providing pictures and digital measurements of parts from my own collection of 1 inch and 1 1/8 chris king headsets, to be told that my 1 1/8 headset was a 1 inch (despite picturing the same part from a 1 inch headset next to a 1 1/8 and the part from this sale in the same photp) was mildly annoying, especially as previous emails about the fact it was from a devolution headset were replied to, but ignored this fact.

I don't expect to get anything out of the seller in terms of recompense as they seem to be upset after being told they were talking rubbish, claiming my 1 1/8 headset was in fact 1 inch, so just posting my experience on here in relation to this sale.

Anyone need a chris king devolution bearing cover?
 
Re: SOLD pending Payment--------Chris King

congratulations.
before you explain me why is not valid, (which I did not know) and I offer reentry of money, without you asking if possible the return of the money, you take shit about me and uneducated.
Congratulations!
if you look at your private, will have a mail asking your paypal, and thanking his explanation because I did not know.

Here, many know me as seller and buyer have never had complaints, now in the most miserable part I find this. it seems absurd that I write, it seems as if I defendiesede ...

as I say, has a private.

congratulations on your manners !!!!
 
Re: SOLD pending Payment--------Chris King

You only offered a refund after I'd stated I didn't want one. I'd be happy to post up every email I sent you on this thread to see where my manners could be questioned. The only thing I said was that you were talking rubbish after you tried to tell me my 1 1/8 headset was a 1 inch one like this:

took measurements and photos of my CK headset.
white1 '
Green 1/4 '

sorry to tell you that your headset is not 1/8,

Your  CK headset blue is 1'!!!

is not a failure of the headset.

Cheers Miguel
This was after I'd sent you pictures and measurements of a 1 inch, 1 1/8 and your devolution part which to me confirmed your part was neither of them. Oh, and telling you many times it was from a devolution headset.

Very dismissive and could be considered direspectful, as you have assumed I don't know what headset I have in my possession, when in fact it was clearly the other way around.

Oh, I did say that I was not going to continue with the conversation if you continued to tell me my 1 1/8 headset was 1 inch and id have to leave feedback appropriately. Is that disrespectful?

I've not said anything in this thread that can be considered 'talking shit' as you put it, it's just factual and I stand by it, along with anything I've emailed you.
 
Re: SOLD pending Payment--------Chris King

ishaw":3ikl5b24 said:
You only offered a refund after I'd stated I didn't want one. I'd be happy to post up every email I sent you on this thread to see where my manners could be questioned. The only thing I said was that you were talking rubbish after you tried to tell me my 1 1/8 headset was a 1 inch one like this:

took measurements and photos of my CK headset.
white1 '
Green 1/4 '

sorry to tell you that your headset is not 1/8,

Your  CK headset blue is 1'!!!

is not a failure of the headset.

Cheers Miguel
This was after I'd sent you pictures and measurements of a 1 inch, 1 1/8 and your devolution part which to me confirmed your part was neither of them. Oh, and telling you many times it was from a devolution headset.

Very dismissive and could be considered direspectful, as you have assumed I don't know what headset I have in my possession, when in fact it was clearly the other way around.

Oh, I did say that I was not going to continue with the conversation if you continued to tell me my 1 1/8 headset was 1 inch and id have to leave feedback appropriately. Is that disrespectful?

I've not said anything in this thread that can be considered 'talking shit' as you put it, it's just factual and I stand by it, along with anything I've emailed you.


this is to throw shit ..
I repeat, you wonder if you return the money before putting shit?
Do Not.
I argument because it was not valid, including the link information and to inform?
No. +

congratulations, thank you for not letting me inform and directly threatened and puy .

I am calm. Many know me as well as you, none has a complaint.

You've Run long before talk and dirty.

have any available pm.
 
I see you have updated the original advert so that it now states what should have been there in the original advert, that it is for a devolution headset, and added the link to the chris king fit guide I emailed you in my attempts to prove you had sold me a devolution headset part and not a 1 1/8 headset part as the original advert stated.

Absolutely no idea what you are talking about in your last post, you mentioned threat, certainly nothing came from me. In your emails you confirmed I was right about the headset part after I sent you the link, now you are stating something completely different in your last post, and after updating the original sale thread to show what it should have done originally, but only after I sent you the information to confirm it.

Previously you said I had been direspectful, and I disagree completely as I have not been. But I will say that you are devious and underhand after updating the sale thread with information I provided you with to confirm that it was originally sold to me, which was a 1 1/8 headset part.
 
I see you have now edited the description to withdraw the sale? I know you didn't see my previous post before doing this as I had not submitted it by the time you had updated the thread again, with a slightly more accurate representation of things.
 
correct.
I upgraded because my description was erroneous. It err is human. there is a problem? I think that is right. I can easily recognize my confusion.

but it costs you seem to have good manners, shows little humility. :facepalm:
before I could see and talk, you threaten and go with this,

I repeat, you have given option to something, I ask the devulucion?

DO NOT.

I will limit myself to get dirty.


I do not want to discuss more, nice show. :lol:
 
Re:

Just for the record. Pictures speak a thousand words.

Image of PM sent, including original sale thread heading automatically added when sending PM (shame I don't have a screenshot of the original sale thread description):

Image of edited sale thread, after various emails, and after I had provided the link to the chris king website to demonstrate that the headset was not as listed (note title and description of the sale item has been changed to reflect the information I provided once I had received the item and it not being as described, as well as the link I provided to the chris king website to help confirm why it was not a 1 1/8 headset bearing cover):

Sale thread now, after a further edit (swiftly edited after the one above).
 

Attachments

  • chrisking-edited.webp
    chrisking-edited.webp
    36.5 KB · Views: 551
  • chrisking-edited-1.webp
    chrisking-edited-1.webp
    39.5 KB · Views: 551
  • chrisking-edited-2.webp
    chrisking-edited-2.webp
    30.4 KB · Views: 551
Back
Top