- Feedback
- View
24pouces":1dilfhey said:kingoffootball":1dilfhey said:There's nothing retro in those bikes :?
See the Flite saddle at the top of the page?
That's a genuine 1995 I'll have you know.
24pouces":1dilfhey said:kingoffootball":1dilfhey said:There's nothing retro in those bikes :?
ultrazenith":jet0xawe said:I'm seeing lots of steel and rigid 29ers here What's the verdict from retrobikers - are rigid 29ers capable beasts?
I'm thinking of going with an On One Inbred 29 with rigid fork and (maybe) fat front wheel. Am I mad? Would a regular 29 front wheel be better?
firedfromthecircus":1ciy8wo4 said:24pouces":1ciy8wo4 said:kingoffootball":1ciy8wo4 said:There's nothing retro in those bikes :?
See the Flite saddle at the top of the page?
That's a genuine 1995 I'll have you know.
ultrazenith":4flydtu2 said:A question to riders of rigid 29ers, do they feel much smoother than a 29 rigid?
jimo746":me811s61 said:ultrazenith":me811s61 said:A question to riders of rigid 29ers, do they feel much smoother than a 29 rigid?
You mean smoother than a 26" rigid?
imo, Yes.
When I first tried one on my local route I found the usual trail lumps and bumps I was expecting the bike to dip and dive into or over weren't half as bad as usual on a 26" wheel. It's not a huge difference, but it is noticeable (to me at least).
Apart from more modern geometry and angles, the bigger wheels were the only difference from my 26" rigid retro Mtb, I concluded that the bigger wheels do in fact make a difference.
Dunno why I didn't try a 29'er years ago Tbh :|