perry":3oj4tbh0 said:singlespeeds arnt cool :shock:
I don't believe anyone on this thread said they were
perry":3oj4tbh0 said:singlespeeds arnt cool :shock:
REKIBorter":3jjhx34p said:hamster":3jjhx34p said:The weight saving (initially on the bike and later from around the waist) from going singlespeed is impressive.
I am living proof that your theory is flawed
hamster":339bgvte said:I agree the temptation to celebrate your smugness and stop the pain can involve beer....
ededwards said:Gears are a recipe for disaster anyway, keep it luddite by not even attempting to change (rear mech + chain tensioner, front mech = chain guide).
quote]
Luddites, I seem to remember went out in the 19th Century around the industrial revolution probably about the same time as penny farthings!
Nothing wrong with gears in my view -but to change gear I have thumbies on the mountain bike, modern STIs on the racing bike and bar end shifters on the cross bike. Now if a girlie can cope..........?
Having said that my next project will probably be a singlespeed if I can find a suitable tiny frame ...
CAS":2t2teypd said:Having said that my next project will probably be a singlespeed if I can find a suitable tiny frame ...