after reading various old magazines and seeing comments posted on here
i present for your ridicule , what are supposed to be 2 of the worst riding
bikes of our era .
a 91 cannondale se1000 and a 92 trek 9200
spent the afternoon in the sunshine getting them ridable
so i will do a bit of a head to head over the next week or so just to find
out how bad they are
the pair have cost about £200 to get to the state pictured
if you can think of anythin worse by reputation let me know
any comments welcome too
i present for your ridicule , what are supposed to be 2 of the worst riding
bikes of our era .
a 91 cannondale se1000 and a 92 trek 9200
spent the afternoon in the sunshine getting them ridable
so i will do a bit of a head to head over the next week or so just to find
out how bad they are
the pair have cost about £200 to get to the state pictured
if you can think of anythin worse by reputation let me know
any comments welcome too
i think this must be the first type of post on this sublect ive read on here..good luck but my money is on the trek being the worst..is that rust i see in those fork boots>
