NWA: Macclesfield Forest 31/01/10 - 'AFTERMATH'

stewlewis":i3gog4tz said:
The GPS/Sporttracks can only estimate based on heartrate, cadence, distance, elevation, weather, wind direction and speed, weight of rider and bike. Calorie estimates are never accurate but I don't think it's far off.

Not very retro though is it? :LOL:
 
Thanks for the pic compliments guys. Remind me to get at the front of people next time though. :LOL:

The 27th Feb ride looks pretty sweet. Hopefully I'll see you all there with Sammy boy in tow too.
 
Remember to pack his smoking jacket this time.... ;-)

Mr K
 

Attachments

  • Heavenly Details.jpg
    Heavenly Details.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 450
A few not so good pic's of the day !
 

Attachments

  • Wait for me !.jpg
    Wait for me !.jpg
    37.3 KB · Views: 439
  • Thumper helps out !.jpg
    Thumper helps out !.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 439
  • rc200ti beats the runners!.jpg
    rc200ti beats the runners!.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 439
  • Raleigh takes the limelight.jpg
    Raleigh takes the limelight.jpg
    63 KB · Views: 439
stewlewis":tj9tyjub said:
unocogero":tj9tyjub said:
stewlewis":tj9tyjub said:
Calories 626

I can't accept it was only 626 calories. I ate that in wine gums ;)

The Human Body is an efficient machine.
The GPS/Sporttracks can only estimate based on heartrate, cadence, distance, elevation, weather, wind direction and speed, weight of rider and bike. Calorie estimates are never accurate but I don't think it's far off.

I use over 626 calories just sat at my desk :D

Great pics everyone.
 
Back
Top