Bram J":37f6y19l said:
"This is unfortunately true, but it is only so because the majority of people are blissfully ignorant when it comes to these allegations. Most will just read a headline such as 'Assange accused of rape' and in their minds think he is guilty. Plus he fears extradition to the USA, maybe rightfully so."
In this particular statement I wasn't referring to the British in particular.
Does that settle it? You poor underestimated Brit.
As it is said on the internets: U mad bro?
I was, however, referring to the British people, and your whole gist is that you somehow have a deeper understanding of matters than others.
You have produced no enlightenment and no explanation for your stance.
Rather like your hero, all air and no meat.
Bram J":37f6y19l said:
As it is said on the internets: U mad bro?
No. I am also not a twelve year old.
Why don't you address the points I wanted clarification on?
You have said Assange is the victim of character assassination.
Who is behind this character assassination? Let me guess... No, tell me.
You have said the allegations against him are ludicrous.
Why do you think allegations that have been assessed by a British court of being worthy of answering in court in Sweden are ludicrous?
Without going into detail, this is a family website, I am fairly content that the allegations merit further investigation, and that what Assange himself has admitted to is not the behaviour of a normal person, and is quite rightly considered as sexual assault in many judicial systems.
I am sure I have accessed as much information as you have on this.
You seem intent on merely batting off anyone else's opinion without providing any insight into your views.
Mad bro?
You must be to keep flogging a dead horse like this.
Incidentally baiil was secured on the basis people thought Assange was innocent, and would not ultimately refuse to face the allegations against him. Guess what he did when he realised the shit was about to get real?
