ultrazenith":xv1xv9az said:Failing that, I could always try CX racing on a rigid retro MTB...
Any mtb would do. I think cx is 90% about fitness tbh.
But a retro rigid mtb would be good, I probably did more cx races on my mtb than mtb races bitd!
ultrazenith":xv1xv9az said:Failing that, I could always try CX racing on a rigid retro MTB...
That's another way in, i rode my XC race bike with rigids and Conti XC 1.5" for a season or two when i was without a CX bike.ultrazenith":j7135s0a said:Failing that, I could always try CX racing on a rigid retro MTB...
Nah, 75% fitness, 20% technique, 4% pit crew, 1% bikejimo746":j7135s0a said:Any mtb would do. I think cx is 90% about fitness tbh.
yes this is an early frame and not that much tyre clearance - 32mm-35mm rubber only (it is UCI CX spec after all) plus limited axle width unless you reset the frame. More modern options exist - I recently uplifted a couple of Kinesis Crosslight Aluminium CX bikes ( for my daughter so small size needed ) and they can go up to 40 mm rubber or even 45mm and are seriously light machines - able to keep up with Carbon frames. They aren't what I would call 'retro' though but are very affordable and eminently upgradeable:^ Love the Orbit. That would be 126mm OLN right? Can't be many of those old school survivors left.