It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 6:01 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 7:18 pm 
Feature Bike
Feature Bike
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:13 pm
Posts: 966
Location: York-ish UK
Here's my Team Stumpy in its latest get up. Bought it in 1989; it's been on the move ever since.


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Last edited by doctor-bond on Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 7:26 pm 
Gold Trader
Gold Trader
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:01 pm
Posts: 885
Location: East Yorks
:shock:lovely, Is that a Paul Components Melvin Chain Tensioner? 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:59 pm 
Feature Bike
Feature Bike
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:13 pm
Posts: 966
Location: York-ish UK
Yup - it's a Melvin. It's a marvellous, well thought-out little device that allows me to run a 3 x 1 set up with 20 teeth difference between the large and small chain rings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:12 pm 
South East Deputy AEC
South East Deputy AEC
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 2945
Location: Angmering
I do like that, and I love the chain tensioner, very cool


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:37 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:17 am
Posts: 881
Location: Norwich, UK
Great bike especially for the year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:42 pm 
Gold Trader
Gold Trader
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:01 pm
Posts: 885
Location: East Yorks
doctor-bond wrote:
Yup - it's a Melvin. It's a marvellous, well thought-out little device that allows me to run a 3 x 1 set up with 20 teeth difference between the large and small chain rings.


I've got one on the way from the states :wink: lovely bike...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:03 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 9:05 pm
Posts: 2128
Location: Morayshire/Yorkshire
That's looking very nice, I have one of these framesets awaiting a renovation at some point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:12 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:30 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Derby
Sweet looking ride :D
love those thin tubes and the curved forks..nice :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 8:26 am 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 42
Location: US
jimo746 wrote:
That's looking very nice, I have one of these framesets awaiting a renovation at some point.


I have an 86 with a U-brake that could use the SS treatment myself. Nice bike.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Stumpy
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:24 pm 
rBoTM Winner
rBoTM Winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:06 am
Posts: 891
Location: Pau, France
Forgive me for saying this but your Stumpy looks older than 88. I'd say 86, the seat stays are too straight for an 88.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:36 pm 
MacRetro rider
MacRetro rider
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 1282
Location: Edinburgh
That's lovely - really nice to see something that's lasted you so long.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stumpy
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:09 pm 
Feature Bike
Feature Bike
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:13 pm
Posts: 966
Location: York-ish UK
agentorange wrote:
Forgive me for saying this but your Stumpy looks older than 88. I'd say 86, the seat stays are too straight for an 88.


I agree that it looks older - the latest build is deliberately anachronistic with many parts from the mid 80's (as well as a sprinkling of newer stuff). However the frame is definately from 88.

This what it looked like when I got it (Although with XT throughout: the catalogue shows the optional browning chainset).

Image

I've been contemplating a back to catalogue build, but can't bring myself to do it. It was always a fine riding bike, but pretty soon after getting hold of it, I started to find ways to lighten it.

It's now well below the 24lb mark and really sings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 7:25 pm 
BoTM Winner / Gold Trader / Rider
BoTM Winner / Gold Trader / Rider
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:37 pm
Posts: 4081
Location: Groningen, Netherlands
Man! That's COOL! 8)

Perfect build!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stumpy
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:09 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 42
Location: US
agentorange wrote:
Forgive me for saying this but your Stumpy looks older than 88. I'd say 86, the seat stays are too straight for an 88.


It is older. 1985 and 1986 had lugged frames, different geometry and new, non-biplane fork. After that they were welded. 1986 was the first year for U-brakes. I'll bet if he checked the S/N it would have 86 in it somewhere. Still, it is a very nice bike. Far nicer than anything I own. Nice job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stumpy
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:03 pm 
rBoTM Winner
rBoTM Winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:06 am
Posts: 891
Location: Pau, France
cs1 wrote:
agentorange wrote:
Forgive me for saying this but your Stumpy looks older than 88. I'd say 86, the seat stays are too straight for an 88.


It is older. 1985 and 1986 had lugged frames, different geometry and new, non-biplane fork. After that they were welded. 1986 was the first year for U-brakes. I'll bet if he checked the S/N it would have 86 in it somewhere. Still, it is a very nice bike. Far nicer than anything I own. Nice job.


Kind of what i was looking at but the above catalogue scan looks later. Team Stumpys were specced with XT from 85 onwards and with the U-brake from 87, prior to this it was fitted with Rollercam U-brake. Check my below link for the 88 version which has butted seat stays.

Here's an 86
Image

Here's an 87
Image

My guess is that you're frame is an 86


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cocodemer, JonSattler, kase1983, Mr.Toad, NeilM, platinumdan, Raleighracer, secret_squirrel, troje, X_armian_X, xerxes and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  



[ Switch to mobile style ]
All content © Retrobike Ltd unless otherwise stated - Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group