Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:00 am

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:54 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:26 pm
Posts: 58
Hi all,

After wanting a full suspension project I stumbled upon a GT idrive comp locally on Facebook, got the bike home to realise that it’s hardly been riden. Been stored in a garage for nearly 10 years and not riden in 5, by the time it had all the cobwebs and muck cleaned off it it’s turned out to not need anything at all, it’s amazing for a 21 year old bike.
So I searched again and found this Marin Rift Zone, £60 offer and it was mine - a good deal I thought. Am I right in thinking it’s a 97 vintage?
This was the opposite to the GT. I got it home and it’s a dog. Clearly been left outside for a good period of time, rear wheel is a random steel job with 6spd cassette and bolted on ( obviously chucked on at some point). Everything weathered, rear shock sounds like it’s sucking air in when it rebounds, manitous are working but it appears the seals are perished. Lx derailleurs and chainset.

So, I think a lot of the parts are going to be binned and start again. I’ve got a Marin Muirwoods from the similar era I got for the wife that she doesn’t want so I’m thinking of using it as a donor bike.

I’m not familiar with these bikes and wondered what standard drivetrain these had and were they high up the list in regards to parts etc?

Is it worth chucking decent kit on or would the stx rc stuff from the muirwoods not be out of place?

If anyone has any advice that would be massively helpful as I have never undertaken a bike restoration of this magnitude!

Cheers

Russ


Attachments:
881E9BBD-5AC8-4DC5-BEEF-C399C16EE286.jpeg
881E9BBD-5AC8-4DC5-BEEF-C399C16EE286.jpeg [ 118.2 KiB | Viewed 252 times ]
E0E6BD1F-0707-4877-846D-07C1972D23FF.jpeg
E0E6BD1F-0707-4877-846D-07C1972D23FF.jpeg [ 159.23 KiB | Viewed 252 times ]
0E1833B9-AFA7-479D-95DA-97B5020A5237.jpeg
0E1833B9-AFA7-479D-95DA-97B5020A5237.jpeg [ 145.84 KiB | Viewed 252 times ]
7E2041A5-47D0-4C8F-B200-C0C4A5B39045.jpeg
7E2041A5-47D0-4C8F-B200-C0C4A5B39045.jpeg [ 146.21 KiB | Viewed 252 times ]
1418B82E-46F3-4463-AA1C-2A899864FBC8.jpeg
1418B82E-46F3-4463-AA1C-2A899864FBC8.jpeg [ 210.02 KiB | Viewed 252 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:04 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:35 am
Posts: 2247
Location: Market Harborough UK
Ive seen a lot worse! (Bought a lot worse too - see my FRS)

It woud have been LX/STX mix so not awful - would have had White Industries cranks too


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:39 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:26 pm
Posts: 58
Cheers, good news re the STX being in line with the spec as it was new, will save me some money that I will need for other things!

Just finished stripping everything off, going to give the frame a good clean, t cut and polish and then gradually work through saving what I can and transferring over what I can’t!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:00 pm 
Retro Guru

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:54 pm
Posts: 693
nice starting point should come up well. nicve to make a difference


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 9:08 pm 
Retro Guru

Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 1541
Location: Almeria, Spain
I believe that they shared the same frame with the Mount Vision and M.V. Pro both of which had better components, (the Pro had a better shock too).
When you are cleaning and checking pay particular attention to the swing arm for cracks.
According to the Marin catalogue (on here) yours seems to be a '97.
I seem to remember that they rode better than my LTS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 10:47 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:26 pm
Posts: 58
Thanks for the info, I’ve been doing some digging and it appears that this has the second gen of rear swing arm, the first gen was prone to cracking much more commonly.
Rear shock needs replacing anyway, so is on the list of things to replace.
Should hopefully be starting the clean up this weekend so will post some updates.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:18 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:36 pm
Posts: 19095
Location: Yorkshire, England
Was just looking at the shox, glad you're replacing it. It has the typical, I got heavier so wound the preload way past it's usable turnings, Shame they never added any limit marks to them.

Fox 165mm Floats are a common shox upgrade. I have a Mount Vision frame hanging up.

You've got the seatpost which is good, as 30.0 are not so common to get hold of.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2021 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group