Ugly modern bikes

The Liteville is OK, the super lame name aside. Reminds me of a Rocky Mountain Element... Straight tubes for the win!
 
Re: Re:

gradeAfailure":1kspg6fh said:
I think that's possibly because far more bikes are FS these days and they tend to be the ones that polarise opinion the most.

Could this look any more class though..?
p5pb8985085.jpg

That is shite hot looking!
 
So it's not perfect by any means and certainly not as nice at the Ti version from last year but this years Explosif isn't looking too shabby. Sure it's not Columbus tubing like the good old days but it is steel and so it doesn't look like it's on steroids. It also means the downtube curve is less pronounced.

explosif.jpg


Last years steel version:

explosif.jpg


And last years ti frame version:

ti_explosif.jpg


The Chris King Cielo MTB frame is lush as well.

cielo_mountainbike_full.jpg


:cool: I'll gladly have this in blue thanks :cool:
 
the chris king is nice id rather have the fork lowers in another colour
maybe polished :) travel looks about 100mm
100mm to 120mm is enough for me :)
 
Been perusing this!
I wonder how opinions are like in 2020?
 
In general, 29ers in sizes S and M looks weird, quite Ugly, only in XL looks like a 26" in M size. Nowadays proportions mainly in 29er are rare.

Quite Ugly ... despite the big size. But not the only one.

portadfa-portadfa-1000.jpg


And what about e-bikes, not bicycles ... motorcycles perhaps. They are in annother league :x

comparativo-e-bikes-275-29-6.jpg
 
Back
Top