do you have short legs or short torso?

otherself

GT Fan
Raleigh Fan
Feedback
View
A while ago I made a personal investigation of cyclists leg length in relation to their total length. Inner leg length can be measured e.g. by holding a book or thin binder against a wall, while at the same time pressing it firmly up against the crotch and measuring from the floor, without shoes. You must be two persons to do this properly.

The results for me were:
Height (without shoes) = 177.5cm (roughly 5ft 10)
Leg Length (without shoes) = 78.9cm
Relative leg length = 44% (78.9/177.5)

If you have really short legs you are close to 41-42%, really long legs are around (or even above) 49-50%. Of course include length differences above the shoulders. Still, it should give some idea of your stature.

You are welcome to add your own data :roll:
/otherself
 
Go on then, I’ll play... my stats;
870mm inside leg
1848mm height
Just over 47%.... I guess that’s why I like a tall bike with a short stem....

otherself":2poiq0m2 said:
You must be two persons to do this properly.
One assumes you use your other self? :LOL:
 
legrandefromage":27pztncg said:
long legs long torso, short arms

an arabian curse

The History Man":27pztncg said:
I cant reach the floor.

It's got lower since I was young.

Come on Chuckle Brothers…. We want monkey stats…. :?
 
184cm, with an 89cm cycling inseam. And I like a French fit, so I'm with the short top tube folks.

Comfy (63cm x 56cm):

1k0.jpg
 
non-fixie":1fgb6kp6 said:
184cm, with an 89cm cycling inseam. And I like a French fit, so I'm with the short top tube folks.

Comfy (63cm x 56cm):

So just over 48%..... I wonder if anyone is freaky, sorry... different :D enough to have an inside leg that’s 50% of their height?
 
Back
Top