marker":qw4g812s said:I like the fork suggestion and could be a good starting point.
Was the Pace rc35 around in 94?
You're disagreeing with yourself cos it was a chubby fingered Apple typo. I just meant XT but for some reason crapple auto corrects it to XT9.secret_squirrel":1xhfpp91 said:Chopper1192":1xhfpp91 said:Unless your frame was built for racing then XT9 maintains the period ethos you seek.
Disagree. XT9 is nowhere near "period" for a 1994 frame.
8 speed XT with Compact Drive M737 is the way to go - new that year.
If Canti's give you the shivers a light stretch to 1996's M739 and V's is permitted, or alternatively magura's or an early disc brake.
Chopper1192":3092bdwi said:You're disagreeing with yourself cos it was a chubby fingered Apple typo. I just meant XT but for some reason crapple auto corrects it to XT9.secret_squirrel":3092bdwi said:Chopper1192":3092bdwi said:Unless your frame was built for racing then XT9 maintains the period ethos you seek.
Disagree. XT9 is nowhere near "period" for a 1994 frame.
8 speed XT with Compact Drive M737 is the way to go - new that year.
If Canti's give you the shivers a light stretch to 1996's M739 and V's is permitted, or alternatively magura's or an early disc brake.
Archemist":6mk0oioz said:marker":6mk0oioz said:I like the fork suggestion and could be a good starting point.
Was the Pace rc35 around in 94?
Yes you're looking a monobox crossover time 35 MXC's and MXCD's (and so a relatively decent amount of travel). Justbackdated (tim) is the god of pace.
gunner":3ac8e3lg said:Archemist":3ac8e3lg said:marker":3ac8e3lg said:I like the fork suggestion and could be a good starting point.
Was the Pace rc35 around in 94?
Yes you're looking a monobox crossover time 35 MXC's and MXCD's (and so a relatively decent amount of travel). Justbackdated (tim) is the god of pace.
My '94 bike came with RC35 XCS rather than the later monobox. Not saying the monobox would be wrong though.
FluffyChicken":jw9gs0dv said:1994 was XCS
1995 was MXC