Crank arm length

Aluminium Ohhh

Retro Guru
What is the reason behind different length crank arms 170, 175, 180mm etc
Was told a long time ago longer legs suit longer arms, is that all there is to it?

Enlighten me please :oops:
 
There's also the torque vs RPM thing to think about.

Longer arms will give you more leverage, increasing your torque. Very useful for MTB-ing. Shorter arms will be more suited to a higher cadence, which is ideal for riding on the road or on rollers.
 
Raging_Bulls":vvf19jjp said:
There's also the torque vs RPM thing to think about.

Longer arms will give you more leverage, increasing your torque. Very useful for MTB-ing. Shorter arms will be more suited to a higher cadence, which is ideal for riding on the road or on rollers.

This argument is always trotted out - however there is also chainring size to consider. If you have difficulty turning the crank then fit a smaller chainring!
The torque is only at the BB shaft - in reality what matters is the tirque at the rear hub, which is affected by the gears.

You need the right length for your legs - too long and you over-articulate the knee, which is inefficient and also increases the risk of injury. Too short is inefficient also.
 
i go from 165 on a road bike to 175 on some mtbs........with plenty in the middle.......remember its not what sits between the legs that matters, its whats inside them.......just get out and ride!..... ;) :D
 
180s are bloody hard to turn over. even very tall people struggle. 175s are great for MTB. 170s if you are short or female. 165s or so if you are a downhiller on a long travel bike and want to avoid pedal strikes.
 
Back
Top