Just when I thought we were getting back on track...o well
John wrote:
There seems to be a collective brain fade when it comes to these Klein repaints at the moment.
Totally agree..even more so now Jons has been shut down and Martins seems to be copping it by those wishing to take it off track..I certianly did enjoy the explanation both visually and by word of the decals
John wrote:
I would however suggest that as others have pointed out the manner in which you chose to start the thread was somewhat disingenuous.
To be fair John it was clear within a few posts of the second page that martin had said you got me and from there it was no problem..to those who pointed this out as disengenous...if you look they were Jon fanboys..the rest of us were not fooled by martins humour and took no offence to it because it was visually informative in a way we had not seen before on rb and for those of us considering Klein paints..very helpfull
John wrote:
Martin did ask if he could advertise his business via his signature which I agreed to. Although the site survives on advertising revenue generally if you have courtesy to ask I'm happy you use the site to plug your work. .
I totally understand the site continues forward not only due to it's members but the advertising revenue. I am puzzled however and pardon my ignorance..given that both Jon and Martin had threads with walk throughs, pictures and explanations why only Martins has this mention of revenue?
Totally understand that if it becomes a free rolling advert for ANY advertiser why then ANY advertisers maybe asked ..hey reel it in a bit or the goodwill over cost will be reviewed..the key here is a visible equal playing field
I would again ask if the thread with it's usefull information and insight into these exspensive paints could continue again without the sidetracking although with one member given the same protection as apple with a u.s. jury I doubt it will. I hope I'm wrong and this thread will find a natural end rather than an opposition led end.