Soulcraft Option3

Sid-James-in-Carry-On-Cle-005.jpg


PHWOOAARR!!!
 
Now rigid,with nicer cranks, and geared again , 2x8.
Nearly there! ;)
 

Attachments

  • DSC01499.JPG
    DSC01499.JPG
    137.9 KB · Views: 784
  • DSC01506.JPG
    DSC01506.JPG
    137.5 KB · Views: 783
Don't let the dog hear you say that! :shock:
Those Vicious forks suit it a treat! ;)
 

Attachments

  • SAM_5177.JPG
    SAM_5177.JPG
    175.7 KB · Views: 768
  • SAM_5176-001.JPG
    SAM_5176-001.JPG
    146 KB · Views: 768
  • SAM_5173-001.JPG
    SAM_5173-001.JPG
    190.5 KB · Views: 768
Every so often I see something that takes my fancy, and think about maybe selling this. Then I go for a ride and forget the idea! ;)
 
Very very nice. I like the SS build best, and that paint job is gorgeous.

FWIW my HR frame weighs in exactly the same as yours quoted above. A few 100 grams more than my other boutique frames, but that is not what this builder is about.

Enjoy!!
 
Well just had to skim the thread since you pointed it out.
I quite like it :)
and the bit on the seat tube isn't some fancy tie wrap, so that answer a question I was going to add.
Do you know why it's reinforced like that and what the actual tubing is (coming from a tubing thread).
Anyways I see some links to go read, that's Sunday's reading for me.
 
I don't know what the piping is, but it feels remarkably similar to this; http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... ight=salsa

made by the same chap ten years earlier.
I'd imagine the seat tube reinforcement is there fot the same reason Dekerf, and others , do it; With all those tubes to join in one area, with all that heat, a non heat treated collar isn't going to be adversly affected.
 
My CK has a very similar arrangement.

IMGP2263.jpg


The strange thing is there is no noticeable step internally :?

Dan (Danson67) thought it an odd addition too!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top