For me (and I imagine most although most on here wouldn't admit it) the would I/wouldn't I question comes before any other consideration. And that has nothing whatsoever to do with intelligence or lack of.
Perhaps you should start a thread with a poll rather than leaning on your instinct.
A poll would be pointless as people who think themselves 'better' than others would lie.
I am not seeing anyone at the minute. If I see a woman my first instinct is would I/wouldn't I. After deciding on I would then I find out more. If she's an arsehole that doesn't trump the fact she looks like a page 3 'stunna'.
Anyone claiming personality is more important is fine, but they have to get past the look first, as by definition it's the first thing we see.
Mens and womens magazines are full of attractive women because people like to look at them (including those who by dint of their own lacking in appearance or personality have no chance with them). This doesn't make them rapists or violent to women, as the Bailey report concluded. Not that evidence (or lack thereof) counts when we've got a feminist witch-hunt to enjoy.
And there is far more danger to children in the food aisles than on the top shelves. And given that most little darlings have internet phones... you know the rest.
Klein Attitude 2003
(unknown) Carrera singlespeed
Muddy Fox Monarch Team 199?