No one has 'right of way' anywhere, cos there's no such thing. There's only 'priority', and that's something given, never taken.
Notwithstanding I get why they like to semantically change the terms, to suit agenda, I find the revisionist reinventing of such terms truly tedious. There once was a time when all and sundry were perfectly happy with the term "right of way" just like "accident", but if there's an agenda to kowtow to...
As per the video, the coppers, if that's what they were arguing, were clearly mistaken. I doubt they would overtake a car or motorcycle with such timing before turning left, and I suspect the cyclist was doing a reasonable pace. Quite clearly what they should have done, when intending to turn left at that junction is slowed and let the cyclist continue, rather than what they did do, and followed with what sounds like abusing their power, which in reality only exists with the consent of the public.
This page intentionally left blank