10 people attacked and killed in 2 years is not a Rare occurrence...
I think the number is very small compared to the number of gun victims. Low enough to prohibit responsible people from carrying some sort of gun? IMO not. I think the USA would profit from more (and much more) gun control. Should everything be banned without decent consideration? Of course not.
It's just that semi-automatics don't belong in the hands of mental cases. Or in the hands of anybody else for that matter.
That is of course just my opinion. The USA can do as it pleases.
Belgium: population circa 10 million, number of people killed by bears is 0, number of people killed by guns in 2010 is 68, 50 of which are suicides.
USA: population circa 313 million, number of people killed by bears since 2010 is 10, number of murders in 2011 is 8583 (no suicides included).
Belgium: 0 bear victims per 10 million 18 murders per 10 million
USA: 0,319 bear victims per 10 million 274,217 murders per 10 million
0,319-0 = 0,319
274,217-18 = 256,217
Which number is the most significant?
Considering this it becomes clear that the number of people possibly saved from bears by guns will never exceed the number of people murdered at the hand of guns. So what is the biggest problem, bears or guns? The numbers don't lie it seems to me.
Good comedians have to reject religion, because to be a good comedian you can't be retarded.