Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:16 am

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:37 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:36 pm
Posts: 16747
Location: Yorkshire, England
gtRTSdh wrote:
.

Do you respect the guy on the bike with the helmet or without a helmet?


When he hits the train i don't think it'll matter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:49 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:29 pm
Posts: 1877
Location: Somerset
FluffyChicken wrote:
gtRTSdh wrote:
.

Do you respect the guy on the bike with the helmet or without a helmet?


When he hits the train i don't think it'll matter
PMSL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:56 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:20 am
Posts: 823
Location: On my sofa
Drewson wrote:
gtRTSdh wrote:
I think he has a type of mental condition, awkward with his words but able to shut off fear completely.

I have more respect for people who take precautions.

Do you respect the guy on the bike with the helmet or without a helmet?


He did say that the reason he free climbs is because he can literally climb freely....without the need to carry equipment and deal with ropes and carabinas, etc. Probably why he was able to climb the face so quickly. I guess it's the most natural way to climb, but very dangerous for many.



Certainly North Face are no mugs, we're talking about a North Face sponsored athlete wearing North Face gear that you can buy down your local high street. I don't think they would sponsor some chancer who might pop off any minute - certainly a lot of money went into that video and the Marketing opportunites for a successful ascent would be phenomenal. It might be hyperbole to suggest that the success of North Face rested on such an ascent.

What would be interesting is all the background research (bird scarers?)and the many times he did that route prior perhaps it'll be included in the dvd version.

There has been one documented death in Yosemite caused by soloing - perhaps climbers are extremely aware of their own limitations, only solo a route they've done many times and never on site solo.

It's human nature that we over-estimate our own skills and prior experience and under-estimate those of others (I am guilty of this) and this I think is the most dangerous aspect of climbing or indeed any activity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:56 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:29 pm
Posts: 1877
Location: Somerset
Drewson wrote:
gtRTSdh wrote:
I think he has a type of mental condition, awkward with his words but able to shut off fear completely.

I have more respect for people who take precautions.

Do you respect the guy on the bike with the helmet or without a helmet?


He did say that the reason he free climbs is because he can literally climb freely....without the need to carry equipment and deal with ropes and carabinas, etc. Probably why he was able to climb the face so quickly. I guess it's the most natural way to climb, but very dangerous for many.
I totally understand it's nicer climbing with no kit. I climbed a cliff two weekends ago bare feet in shorts and a shirt, got to about 15 feet & thought shouldn't be doing this, couldn't exactly climb down so had to carry on, the top was about 25ft. Most people prefer riding without a helmet including myself. . . He's obviously highly highly skilled, shame he's 99% going to an early grave, probably a virgin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:01 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:20 am
Posts: 823
Location: On my sofa
gtRTSdh wrote:
Drewson wrote:
gtRTSdh wrote:
I think he has a type of mental condition, awkward with his words but able to shut off fear completely.

I have more respect for people who take precautions.

Do you respect the guy on the bike with the helmet or without a helmet?


He did say that the reason he free climbs is because he can literally climb freely....without the need to carry equipment and deal with ropes and carabinas, etc. Probably why he was able to climb the face so quickly. I guess it's the most natural way to climb, but very dangerous for many.
I totally understand it's nicer climbing with no kit. I climbed a cliff two weekends ago bare feet in shorts and a shirt, got to about 15 feet & thought shouldn't be doing this, couldn't exactly climb down so had to carry on, the top was about 25ft. Most people prefer riding without a helmet including myself. . . He's obviously highly highly skilled, shame he's 99% going to an early grave, probably a virgin.


'He's obviously highly highly skilled, shame he's 99% going to an early grave, probably a virgin'

Didn't Darwin have an award for that sort of thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:50 pm 
Gold Trader
Gold Trader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:28 pm
Posts: 3361
Location: The Admiral Benbow
thats what these guys are for


Attachments:
IMG_8939_American_Black_Vulture_ed_5_7_60.jpg
IMG_8939_American_Black_Vulture_ed_5_7_60.jpg [ 29.5 KiB | Viewed 184 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group