If you read Lance's statement it seems crazy that the USADA can catch an athlete cheating and then offer them a reduced sentence if he testifies against another athlete whether guilty or not, just based on cutting deals to change their "I didnt see anything statements" and themselves getting a reduced sentence.
How does that work, crazy? So if an athlete holds a grudge and has cheated he can just say oh i saw Lance (or whoever) doping - yet Lance has never tested positive
The USADA acting as judge, jury and executioner.
Hopefully the USADA will realise they are not the authority on the global stage and cannot strip Lance of the Tours as only the UCI can do that and i cant see that happening as who are they going to give them to? Who else in the peloton in those 7 years has gone through the same rigorous testing and scrutiny