Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:33 pm

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: So is it 26 or 27.5"
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:05 am 
GOLD | PoTM | Rider | rBOTM
GOLD | PoTM | Rider | rBOTM
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:26 pm
Posts: 22130
Location: 54 Festive Road Winchcombe GLOUCS Yarp...
In case you didn’t realise I like them. My other two. Both xl

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So is it 26 or 27.5"
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:44 pm 
Dirt Disciple
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:46 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Chorley
I did a local red route circuit a couple of weeks ago in bone dry conditions.11 mins 31 secs. The fastest I've done in years. This was on my 27.5" Boardman FS Pro. I took my Whyte PRST4 up but felt a bit jaded. I thought I may as well still have a go at a fast lap. 11 mins 12 seconds. That, to me, is a statistically significant result. The 12 year older bike is 19 seconds quicker. The downhills were a bit more daunting and it was skipping about in places where the Boardman would have gripped. But since you spend most of your lap climbing the lower tyre drag and magic, intuitive linkage front suspension don't rob you of nearly as much energy.
Someone needs to bring back linkage front forks. BMW have done it for motorcycles so why not? 150mm of travel would suit me, matched at the rear. Wouldn't mind 27.5" wheels, curiously, or even 29ers. I'd chose a narrow tyre on the rear in dry conditions and use an unfashionably high pressure but reckon I'd get round my test track quicker than on any other bike.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:29 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:36 pm
Posts: 17714
Location: Yorkshire, England
Less than 3% quicker.

Looking through my Strava for similar timed segments shows a much wider spread over just one of my 26" bikes, let alone over all of my bikes.

Are you a racing athlete, if so then yes 3% is significant as you'll know what your best is.
Not one, then it is easily day to day variation, ground conditions, tyre pressures, wind direction, gps differences, when you last ate..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bolly and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group