Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:42 pm

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:07 pm 
Mr Darcy
Mr Darcy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 5687
Location: Bicester
P20 wrote:
Stans. Ive got 355 on the yeti 575. Used them for nearly 2yrs, had a fair amount of stick and they've been superb. Olympics or crest if you want lighter again, they do both rim and disc options. I think they're getting down to 330grams. I've got some new crests on order for another build


what he said.

Have some crest and they are great


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 4:29 pm 
BANNED USER
BANNED USER

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 3809
I think mavic 230's are pretty light as wheels go :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:16 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 336
Location: Bagshot
kaiser wrote:
Sun EQ21 and EQ21L


I had a set of those EQ21's I think, fantastically light, but they are dead now, although, they did get absolutely hammered, accidental 9ft gap jump anyone? :roll: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:38 pm 
King of the DuckBoard
King of the DuckBoard

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:30 pm
Posts: 21466
kaiser wrote:
EQ21L


Shame not that stated weights of 375 g but 391 & 394 g :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:44 pm 
BoTM Winner
BoTM Winner

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:50 pm
Posts: 340
Location: Ontario, Canada
tintin40 wrote:
kaiser wrote:
EQ21L


Shame not that stated weights of 375 g but 391 & 394 g :roll:


Lucky you, mine was 400g. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:13 pm 
King of the DuckBoard
King of the DuckBoard

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:30 pm
Posts: 21466
Baulz wrote:
tintin40 wrote:
kaiser wrote:
EQ21L


Shame not that stated weights of 375 g but 391 & 394 g :roll:


Lucky you, mine was 400g. :cry:


:shock: :( Sorr to read that

It really pisses me off that manufacturers claims are so wrong :x

At least the 717 are wrong in a lighter way 15 g lighter than claimed. But why can't they get it correct. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: captaincowelly and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group