When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Very Poorly Clockwork
- Thread starter KDM
- Start date
TonyMerryfield
Retro Guru
Listed as 17" but looks 19" to me?
TonyMerryfield
Retro Guru
Top tube isn't inline with the top of the back wheel like on mine... It has weird proportions, as you say the front looks really small!
- Feedback
- View
Re:
The early ones (1989 to early 91) had shorter headtubes then the later ones and the seat stays met the seat tube lower down. The headtube on my 21" 89 is the same as my old 19" Prestige.
Saying that, I'd still call this a 17".
The early ones (1989 to early 91) had shorter headtubes then the later ones and the seat stays met the seat tube lower down. The headtube on my 21" 89 is the same as my old 19" Prestige.
Saying that, I'd still call this a 17".
TonyMerryfield
Retro Guru
Bottom bracket looks really high too - might just be the angle the pic was taken at though.
If this had been my first view of a Clockwork I doubt I'd be an owner of one now!
If this had been my first view of a Clockwork I doubt I'd be an owner of one now!
Yes i'd certainly say it was a 17 inch model and most definitely a late 80's to early 90's and those forks were probably put on to replace a pair of rigid one's and i just hope who ever buys it take's the time to fully restore it as that frame looks in fair nick regardless of the paint ..
TonyMerryfield
Retro Guru
On the subject of forks, what are they? They look awful but then also have something of a first gen Manitou about them... cheap copies?
