if you don't like then don't look or click simple
Sort of missing the point in a 'haven't actually read or understood the point of the post' type way, but still you wade in with the tired roll eye quote. This was a constructive criticism and I am an active and constructive member of this forum and occasionally voice my feelings, as others are also free to do.
John and the mods have recently taken to posting loads of generic threads, I didn't think it was the best approach. That doesn't mean that my view is right or their view is right, but
it does not mean that you should be so dismissive of my view in that flippant, 'if you're not with us, you're against us' type crap. Especially you who support so many liberal causes that are fundamentally about changing things for the better and freedom of expression, how do you think that gels with that fundamentalist view that you just voiced, eh?
Why not take some time and construct a cogent argument and make me want to believe your point of view that leaving things the way they are is the best way to do things for this site?
The point that I was raising is that if we post up loads of crap then the good stuff gets shunted off the front page, if the good stuff gets shunted off then there are less clicks and therefore less cash to the site.
Now why don't you respond with your argument that is based on a structured assembly of facts as you view them rather than some absolute statement that offers no resolution, compromise or understanding of my point of view.