I'm all for banter and constructive critique, but when someone enters a bike (with a few very poor blurred photos I might add)
the above was a quote
there you go,bitches ....BSO and bad photos, so what!
i was on the way to work using my phone camera,i aint david bailey....and i cant believe the snobs are taking the slagging off to 12 pages
do you want me to remove mine then? dont bother me
My previous post should not have been taken as any
kind of endorsement of this
I fail to see why the two ends of the spectrum can't co-exist without all the petty slanging backwards and forwards between the differing proponents?
There's no harm in the lower spec. bikes being entered because it's all in the spirit of the 'anything goes'
legend - they're no threat to the potential winners because no-one will vote for them but we can have a bit of a laugh and some righteous banter in the run up to
the vote; and I doubt John would put any through in the final selection anyway?
Perhaps in the 'anything goes'
months we should
have a 'Rat
ro Bike of the Month' as well, the only stipulation being that it should be a daily rider and not some skip-find piece of tat entered only to spoil/provoke??