Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:49 am

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ

Forum rules


**Classified Rules & Guidance - Feedback - Dispute Procedure - Gold Trader Status - All Adverts Need A Price - 5 Adverts Maximum - Leave Prices In Sold Adverts - No cross posting adverts**



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 6:24 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 14
Thanks for everyones help in narrowing down the year and parts. I have amended the title from 94 to 93 Dynatech and RS 30's suspension.

Thanks. Much appreciated


Top
 Profile  
 
Register or login to remove these adverts


PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 6:45 pm 
Gold Trader
Gold Trader

Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2300
Location: Nottingham
I always regretted shifting mine! Not sure what size it was, so trying to compare:

Image

What's the c b/b to saddle top on yours as set up in photos? I may be tempted!

They are a lovely long-distance riding bike I think - but much nicer with rigid front!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:34 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:36 pm
Posts: 17842
Location: Yorkshire, England
Mag30 which these are are 1992 model forks.

Not sure if that dates the frame as 1992. Do serials help with these frames.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:43 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 14
oldave wrote:
I always regretted shifting mine! Not sure what size it was, so trying to compare:

Image

What's the c b/b to saddle top on yours as set up in photos? I may be tempted!

They are a lovely long-distance riding bike I think - but much nicer with rigid front!



Hi Dave. That is a good looking Dynatech. They do ride very smooth.

Sorry, not too sure what c b/b stands for but I can measure any part for you. The stem is not stuck to one height also (which I know can happen on the older models of any bike) and can be adjusted very easily to its lowest or highest point.

Please let me know which measurements you require

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:37 am 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:36 pm
Posts: 17842
Location: Yorkshire, England
He wants the length from the bottom bracket/crank axle to the top of the seat you sit on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:49 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 359
Location: Hampshire
FluffyChicken wrote:
Mag30 which these are are 1992 model forks.

Not sure if that dates the frame as 1992. Do serials help with these frames.


Hi,

Yes serial numbers help. My 93 Diablo RS was a 1992 frame, serial number started with a 'C'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:08 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 14
Clifford wrote:
FluffyChicken wrote:
Mag30 which these are are 1992 model forks.

Not sure if that dates the frame as 1992. Do serials help with these frames.


Hi,

Yes serial numbers help. My 93 Diablo RS was a 1992 frame, serial number started with a 'C'



FluffyChicken my serial number begins A


Attachments:
10566485_10204252336127756_855516948_n.jpg
10566485_10204252336127756_855516948_n.jpg [ 58.53 KiB | Viewed 157 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:11 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 14
Matt123 wrote:
oldave wrote:
I always regretted shifting mine! Not sure what size it was, so trying to compare:

Image

What's the c b/b to saddle top on yours as set up in photos? I may be tempted!

They are a lovely long-distance riding bike I think - but much nicer with rigid front!



Hi Dave. That is a good looking Dynatech. They do ride very smooth.

Sorry, not too sure what c b/b stands for but I can measure any part for you. The stem is not stuck to one height also (which I know can happen on the older models of any bike) and can be adjusted very easily to its lowest or highest point.

Please let me know which measurements you require

Thanks



OldDave. I have taken the stem as high as it will go and have placed the measuring tape next to it. This also shows the height of the frame from the bracket/ crank. Hope this helps

Thanks


Attachments:
10566604_10204252335087730_515951292_n.jpg
10566604_10204252335087730_515951292_n.jpg [ 123.26 KiB | Viewed 154 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:14 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 14
Fully extended seat post stem


Attachments:
File comment: Fully extended seat post stem
10555217_10204252335447739_1065549912_n.jpg
10555217_10204252335447739_1065549912_n.jpg [ 91.87 KiB | Viewed 152 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:20 pm 
Dirt Disciple

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Posts: 14
Re: Frame size taken with tape sitting on top of crank axle


Attachments:
10529698_10204252333647694_1649527802_n.jpg
10529698_10204252333647694_1649527802_n.jpg [ 57.11 KiB | Viewed 147 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chromoly, Double-E F, Ferry and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group