Do we need more than just Campag, Shimano & SRAM?

ZG862

Retro Guru
Rather than hijack @AWVelocetec86's intro thread about his rather nice Raleigh, I thought I'd move some comments within it to their own discussion:

AWVelocetec86":nsxiedcq said:
Out of interest, why the irrational bias against Raleigh and Shimano?

I":nsxiedcq said:
(blah, blah, blah ... many years ago, I) felt quite strongly that Shimano basically ripped off Suntour's technically superior designs and then "won" with a bigger marketing budget - in much the same way that VHS triumphed over Betamax. Shimano pretty much pioneered the concept of the group set in everyday bikes, which eventually led to the demise of component specialists.

LeGrandFromage":nsxiedcq said:
Shimano 'won' because of the indexing and the later ramped cassettes. Suntour made a big error in forgetting to renew their derailleur patents too which Shimano leaped upon and the rest is history.

I":nsxiedcq said:
I do wish another (British?) Suntour would emerge in the market to shake things up a bit. Surely there is a space for design-led, well-engineered components? Hummingbird are perhaps the closest to what I'm thinking.
 
Good question. Personally I would like to see less. There's just a phenomenal amount of bike tat out there to choose from as it is - old or new. Also need to remember Shimano (like Nikon and Canon) were / are good at flooding the market at the right time with the right price. It would be extremely difficult to compete with Shimano for the lower end stuff without having something really nasty.

I do find it incredible that Campag can actually stay operating by only producing road parts.
 
Having seen what Campagnolo came up with as their MTB I’m glad they dipped out

Their brake levers are probably the most hideous thing I’ve ever seen - glad they’ve stuck to what they are good at
 
Re:

Hope have a good share of the market in certain areas .I use their head sets and hubs on my three modern bikes .Also had their disc brakes on my mtb a few years back . I found them superb . Hope rim brakes stop our tandem in short order .
As for derailleurs so far they have left it to others .

As good range of components imho .
https://www.hopetech.com/product-documents/drivetrain/

Middleburn and High path are also providing excellent products .
I dream of a set of Royce Venus hubs for my Mercian .
 
I’ve noticed some bits & bats from (I presume brand name under new ownership) a re-born Chater-lea...aiming themselves squarely at the more money than sense brigade.. (flat pedals at £250 a pop)
 

Attachments

  • 25E669D7-5A99-454D-9D06-DADD5645264B.jpeg
    25E669D7-5A99-454D-9D06-DADD5645264B.jpeg
    40.6 KB · Views: 665
Thanks all for your thoughts. You've given me some names that I've never heard of to explore.

@Woz: I'd like to see less tat too, but a greater choice - particularly of parts that offer a genuine advantage. If there's no advantage to be had, then I'd settle for less ugly, for example, handlebar stems for threadless forks are a mess. Compare with Cinelli Record.
@Peachy: Very nicely lit pic, but rivetted end plates???
 
ZG862":3m0j217p said:
@Peachy: Very nicely lit pic, but rivetted end plates???

Yup, I think they missed a trick there.... brass machine screws would have been cool
 
Rotor do a groupset somewhere out there

Campagnolo are on their last legs

Sunrace do a viable budget Shimano alternative

Microshift as mentioned.

Sachs had a good go at it before Sram swallowed them aalllllll

It was a bit of a shock to find that DNP used to do budget parts that didnt look too bad and worked ok


*DNP Campagnolo-esque MTB rear mech, Shimano copy front and yes, 8 speed thumbies

**The more I look at that mech and realise that its more like an older Suntour
 

Attachments

  • dnp groupset.jpg
    dnp groupset.jpg
    265 KB · Views: 616
  • dnp shimano copy.jpg
    dnp shimano copy.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 616
  • dnp thumby.jpg
    dnp thumby.jpg
    228.3 KB · Views: 616
Re:

As I get older, I look at some of the traditional stuff with nostalgia, but then I let my head rule my heart to say some of the modern stuff is actually quite good. When carbon frames arrived we all questioned their durability. 20 years on, I see frames with carbon rear triangles and forks and full carbon frames still in existence, being used daily.

Not to pick on the poster, but threadless stems were cited as being modern design failures. On the contrary, I see them as being far better. If I look at old Cinelli stems, a stem swap often meant a seized steerer and then removal of tape and levers (maybe cables too) be for what should be a 5 minute job, which it now is. The Cinelli 1A nose bolts either seized, rounded off or snapped and the 1R wedgy thingy was awkward. On top of this bars creaked like billy-o depending on how hot the weather was.

Probably not going to be a popular post on here, just trying to be objective
 
Back
Top