Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:56 pm

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 2:32 am 
Retro Guru

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:31 am
Posts: 585
Location: London
But it stills looks crap, like any other modern sloping top tube frame with oversize tubing, underneath the paint it might as well be carbon etc. And it's got carbon forks, so only half the "frame" (frame and forks) is steel.

Yeah, by modern standards 1.6-1.7kg for a 54cm is just feeble, it's not much lighter than 30 year old 753 frames.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:08 am 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:08 am
Posts: 6848
Location: Nth Somerset, UK
David B wrote:
NeilM wrote:
The design guys at Genesis have been working very closely with Reynolds to get the stiffness they need at a weight that's acceptable.


It's fairly exotic stuff they're working with, too - as well as 953 (martensitic aging stainless) there's another new stainless tubeset called 931 which is precipitation-hardening steel. I used to work in a lab that analysed those kinds of alloys - quite demanding specs!

David


The training bikes they have are all in 931 with 953 for the race bikes.

I think it's a bold move by a professional road team. Promoting a brand is one thing, but doing it in International competition could backfire horribly, unless the team can rack up top results on a regular basis.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:39 am 
Retro Guru

Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:57 pm
Posts: 774
If they can get the bike to the UCI 6.8kg limit, who's worried where the weight is? The fat tubes probably mean that's gonna be a fairly firm ride - think I'd prefer something skinnier with a bit more zing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:03 am 
Gold Trader / MacRetro rider
Gold Trader / MacRetro rider

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:33 am
Posts: 3098
Location: Riding my Woodsie.
Seems they want the stiffness though.

For us 'zing' maybe equates to a bit of comfort but to the pros it probably means the loss of half a watt of power.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: glpinxit, keithglos, Midlife, mydadscondor and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group